Is the Indian Judiciary Truly Accessible to the Middle Class and Poor?

Introduction 

The Indian Judiciary is  frequently praised as the  protection of republic, icing justice for all. The  verity,  still, paints a  veritably different picture. The judicial system appears to work efficiently only for the rich, influential, and celebrities, while the middle class and poor struggle to  pierce justice. The question that arises is Is the Indian bar truly accessible to the common people? 

The Myth of Equal Treatment 

Numerous argue that the Indian Judiciary treats everyone inversely. But before accepting this claim, let us consider some hard data. Have you ever seen a  corner decision favoring a poor or middle- class person in the Supreme Court? If yes, how long did it take for that decision to be delivered? 

The  verity is, the Judiciary is  frequently slow and  precious, making it nearly  insolvable for ordinary citizens to fight legal battles. Cases drag on for times,  occasionally decades, while the rich and  important manage to get instant relief through  precious  attorneys and political connections. 

Language Barrier in the Supreme Court 

India is a different country with multiple languages spoken across  countries, including Hindi, Tamil, Telugu, Bengali, Odia, and Kannada. still, Supreme Court proceedings are conducted primarily in English. This raises a  pivotal question Is the Judiciary truly popular if it doesn't accommodate the  verbal diversity of its citizens? 

Only about 15% of Indians speak and understand English easily, and  utmost of them belong to elite or influential classes. This effectively excludes 85% of the population from completely understanding and  sharing in their own legal proceedings.However, how can it claim to support republic? 

Declining Public Trust in the Judiciary 

There's growing frustration among common people regarding the Indian judicial system. further and  further citizens are losing faith in courts due to colorful reasons 

Detainments in justice : Cases remain undetermined for times, leaving victims and their families in torture. 

Lack of availability : The middle class and poor find it delicate to approach advanced courts due to  fiscal and logistical constraints. 

Rude and harmful  attorneys : numerous  attorneys are n't polite or collaborative, making legal battles indeed harder for the common man. 

Influence of wealth and power : The rich get justice in days, while the poor are sidelined for times. 

Controversial court remarks : Courts  frequently make gratuitous and occasionally controversial  commentary that  produce public confusion. 

Judicial  hindrance in  public security matters : The Judiciary occasionally oversteps its  part, creating hurdles in security and governance  programs. 

Further speeches, smaller conduct rather of taking strong measures, courts are frequently seen giving lengthy homilies without real  results. 

The Harsh Reality Justice Delayed is Justice Denied 

It's generally said that" justice delayed is justice denied," and this holds true in India. numerous innocent individualities spend times in jail staying for their cases to be heard, while fat culprits get quick bail and indeed favorable verdicts. 

For illustration, high-profile cases involving politicians and celebrities are frequently  presto-tracked, while a common man’s case may take decades. In some cases, victims indeed die before they see justice being served. 

Results to Ameliorate Judicial Availability 

While the problems in the judicial system are massive, certain reforms can help bridge the gap between the judiciary and common citizens 

Speedy Trials — Increase the number of judges and fast- track courts to clear the massive backlog of cases. 

Affordable Legal Aid — Strengthen free legal aid services for poor and middle- class petitioners. 

Judicial Responsibility — Judges must be held  responsible for detainments and  prejudiced judgments. 

Use of Technology — Online  sounds, AI- driven case  operation, and digital attestation can speed up processes. 

Language Addition — Supreme Court and high courts should allow proceedings in indigenous languages. 

Strict Action Against Corruption — attorneys and judges involved in unethical practices should face strict consequences. 

Public mindfulness — Educating citizens about their legal rights will help them navigate the judicial system more. 

Conclusion 

The Indian judiciary is one of the pillars of republic, but it's failing the people who need it the most. Justice shouldn't be a  honor for the rich but a right for all. Until meaningful reforms are  enforced, the middle class and poor will continue to suffer while the  fat and influential manipulate the system to their advantage. It's time for change — justice must be made accessible, affordable, and fair for everyone. Only through comprehensive legal reforms and increased  translucency can we hope to  produce a bar that serves all citizens inversely. By prioritizing the  requirements of the underserved, we can restore faith in the legal system and  insure that justice is indeed eyeless, acting as a true  protection of republic for every  existent.

🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏